Frightfest Posts Coming Soon

[![](http://www.istherefood.com/wp- content/uploads/2008/08/stposterversion3.jpeg)](http://www.istherefood.com/wp- content/uploads/2008/08/stposterversion3.jpeg)I was at this year’s Frighfest in London yesterday. T’was indeed an awesome day of horror.

I’m going to post reviews of the 6 films over the next few days, but for now here’s a summary of my Twittering throughout the day:

  • “Frightfest Sunday begins. Think From Within might be today’s turkey, but keeping an open mind.”

  • “Unimpressed by Frightfest’s first offering of the day. Heavy handed, predictable, and lacking suspense. What say you, other Frightfesters?”

  • “Let The Right One In: Morrissey would be proud. Beautiful, moving Swedish vampire awesomeness. Want to see it again. Will settle on the book”

  • “Broken: Lena is pretty, but cannot save such a boring, boring film. Seems the #frightfest back channel agree!”

  • “Autopsy: fun gore-fest with some gloriously colourful lighting and imaginative gore. Nothing too deep, but sometimes that’s what you want.”

  • “And next is Martyrs. Which is all about teddy bears, chocolate biscuits and marshmellows. Or something.”

  • “Martyrs: cannot do this justice in 140 characters. Quite special I think. Deeper exploration on blog later. Challenging film though.”

  • “Jack Brooks: good stuff. Think Brain Dead, Bad Taste, Evil Dead. Decent effects, good laughs (Howard) and the perfect end to my FF trip!”

Frightfest 08: From Within

[![](http://www.istherefood.com/wp- content/uploads/2008/08/fromwithin4-300x200.jpg)](http://www.istherefood.com /wp-content/uploads/2008/08/fromwithin4.jpg)This year’s Frightfest experience started with 3:10 to Yuma cinematographer Phedon Papamichael’s supernatural thriller. On a day that promised Swedish Vampires (Let The Right One In) and a film touted as “the most extreme film ever” (Martyrs), I had relatively low expectations for From Within.

Elizabeth Rice plays Lindsay, a teenager in a small religious town, with an alcoholic mother, and a bible bashing boyfriend. During the film’s first few moments, Lindsay is exposed to the suicide of a local goth girl, who in turn has just been covered in her boyfriend’s brain matter after shooting himself in the opening scene. It soon becomes apparent to the audience - albeit not the characters - that something is travelling from the last suicide victim’s body to whoever discovers it, causing them to be stalked by, and ultimately forced to take their own lives at the hand of a zombified mirror image of themselves.

The film soon reveals that suicide number one was the son of a local witch. A witch who just happens to have been burned alive by the town’s people after having a hand in the drowning of a popular member of the community. The town folk decide that it’s the witch’s remaining son, played by Sarah Connor Chronicle’s Thomas Dekker, who must be the cause of all the suicides. Queue predictable building of the town folk’s aggression, culminating in them all but taking up pitch forks and flaming torches, and invading Dekker’s home in the film’s final stages.

It’s the same kind of religious insanity which was so brilliantly expressed in Frank Darabont’s adaptation of The Mist, but in this film it feels unoriginal and uninvolving. I didn’t feel enough of an attachment to the protagonists to really care that they were about to be set upon by psychotic Christians.

If you’re a young teen looking for a slice of acceptable, light weight, inoffensive horror then this is probably for you. There’s very little real gore, and plenty of teen angst. Dekker is in full on emo mode, grunting his way though the film in a manner more annoying than anything I’ve seen him in before. He’s a crap John Connor, and he’s an even worse emo son of a witch.

Our teen heroine is clearly being forced into a religious belief that she perhaps doesn’t totally feel comfortable with and I’m sure that’s something with which younger viewers could identify. All the characters are so two dimensional and lacking in complexity that this just doesn’t feel like it was ever intended for grown ups.

The evil twins aren’t scary, there’s absolutely no tension thanks to telegraphed scares that you can see coming from a country mile, and there’s an ending that’s insultingly explained for any morons in the audience. Nothing is left to guesswork here. Papamichael might know how to get a great shot - although I wasn’t as impressed with the look of this particular film as certain other reviewers seem to be, which could be the result of the pretty awful print we were shown - but when given free reign to build up atmosphere as a director he fails very, very badly. After several scenes failed to provide any kind of tension, I started to lose interest.

I’ll admit that I liked the ultimate outcome of the film, and it’s not really in keeping with the light weight nature of what’s gone before. There’s also a comparatively nasty burning alive scene, which feels a little forced and seems to come out of nowhere. These positives are few though, and can’t redeem what’s gone before, sadly.

From Within also features one of the most unintentionally hilarious scenes in recent memory, as Thomas Dekker applies a curse suppressing waxy witchy goo to various parts of a fully clothed Elizabeth Rice’s anatomy. “Does everything need to be covered?” she asks. Dekker then uses the “Try not to sweat” line, which is, if I recall correctly, shamelessly nicked from Mimic.

There’s a kind of Final Destination vibe developing mid way through the film, but this is dispelled rapidly and doesn’t really go anywhere. With a director who better understands the genre, some extra meat on the anaemic bones of its characters, and some more imaginative kills, this could have been OK. As it is, this is really “my first horror film” territory.

Frightfest 08: The Broken

[![](http://www.istherefood.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/broken- 300x159.jpg)](http://www.istherefood.com/wp- content/uploads/2008/08/broken.jpg)I’m leaping perilously out of chronological order here, because I want to get the reviews of the films that I didn’t enjoy out of the way first. Which is a bit foolish, because it’s often easier to find something to say about something you didn’t like than something you did. And I didn’t like The Broken.

The title most obviously refers to the numerous broken mirrors in the film, but it could just as easily allude to a number of other things, such as the main character’s car, or her lost memory. The film’s plot involves strange pod-person-esque doppelgangers - maybe The Broken of the title? - entering our world through mirrors and immediately setting out on a mission to kill their double. Once done they take their place in the world and act like unemotional automatons. Quite why they do this is never explained, but the film vaguely hints that this phenomenon is more widespread than just the characters under scrutiny here, and that the mirror people assist each other in carrying out their mission.

There’s a suggestion that the reason for the appearance of these creatures is because a mirror has been broken. So “deary me Jimbo, now you’ve broken that mirror you’ll have 7 years’ bad luck” becomes “curses Jimbo, after carelessly breaking that mirror, you’ll now be hunted down and killed by your double, who’ll then live your life for you, but take absolutely no pleasure in doing so”.

Lena Headey plays central character Gina. While enjoying a surprise birthday party for their father, Gina and family witness the dramatic shattering of a large mirror (see previous paragraph for why this is significant). Soon after we’re shown Gina’s bathroom mirror shatter, and high heels walking purposefully out of the bathroom. Gina then sees herself driving her car home, has a confrontation with the driver, manages to drive head first into a taxi while driving the car she previously saw someone who looked just like her driving, and wakes up in hospital with a nasty case of amnesia. Are you following this?

The film then takes what feels like three years focusing on Gina’s steady realisation that the mirror people are replacing her family members, starting with her boyfriend. But of course nobody believes her, least of all her mysteriously accented psychologist (Ulrich Thomsen), who just seems to blink out of existence during the film’s later stages. They all think her suspicions are simply caused by the trauma of the accident. That, and the fact that her boyfriend is a terrible actor, and nobody notices he’s been replaced, other than him suddenly taking a dislike to his own dog and frowning a lot.

Along the way we’re treated to such over-used horror staples as the dreaded dripping leak in the bathroom ceiling, the double dream sequence, and the M. Night Shyamalan “unexpected” twist. Except the twist here is probably obvious to anyone with half a brain from very early on, and results in there being absolutely no tension - or interest - in the remainder of the film. The audience can therefore amuse themselves playing spot the bloodshot eye, as Lena’s red contact lens seems to come and go with each new scene, laughing in the face of any sort of continuity.

Director Sean Ellis does a pretty good job. The film is usually nice to look at, and features some stunning views of our nation’s capitol. It’s the film’s look that brings me to prefer this over the day’s first film From Within.

But chunks of the film are repeated ad nauseam, such as Gina’s slow-mo crumpling Jeep Cherokee, and flashes of her confrontation, and despite being visually interesting it becomes quite tiring. I realise this is all intended to show Gina’s memory slowly returning, but after seeing the same red Jeep crumple in extreme slow motion for the fifth time I was contemplating what to have from Burger King after the film.

There’s an extreme sense of vagueness that seems to permeate the whole thing, and while it’s possible that this was the intention given the film’s themes, it doesn’t make for a terribly compelling horror movie. I’m not sure whether it was heavily recut or not, but it just seems to chase its own tail for a while and then resolve things in a predictable yet confusing and nonsensical manner which I’ll not spoil here. It all feels rather pointless when the credits roll.

Ultimately, The Broken’s biggest fault is that it’s very, very dull. I like Lena Headey, and I like the idea of another world inside our mirrors that somehow spawns evil beings. But the concept is under used - why not allow the mirror people to use the mirrors to move around, or offer some explanation as to what they wanted? - and instead the film depends more on confusing its audience, throwing in a gratuitous shower scene complete with over the top death, and hoping that the final twist is enough to make people think this is a good movie.

Which, I’m sorry to say, it’s not.

But fear not, because the remaining four Frightfest reviews are all of great films, and will be gracing these very pages soon.

Feed Problem and New Front Page

Apologies if you’re reading this using a feed reader. It seems that adding a WordPress excerpt for the two Frightfest reviews caused them to not show up in my RSS feed for the site. I’ve deleted the excerpts and hopefully the problem won’t appear again. If anyone knows how to use excerpts on posts with WordPress and not have the feed affected, I’d love to know. Otherwise I’ll figure out a workaround.

In other news, the front page of Is There Food has ditched the magazine look, and gone with straight blog again. There wasn’t enough variety of posts to make the magazine view work, and a few people actually said they found it harder to find latest posts. So back to the blog look we go.

More Frightfest reviews coming over the next couple of days. There’s some zombie news coming too!